Below are lists of publications about CPR and relevent references.
Balfour, S. Teaching Writing and Assessment Skills: The Intrinsic and Conditional
Pedagogy of Calibrated Peer Review™. Assessment Handbook (submitted), contact
email@example.com for pre-print.
Berry, F.C., P.A. Carlson, and D.L. Millard. 2006. Calibrated Peer Review for ABET
Assessment. Proceedings of the National STEM Assessment Conference, 190-193.
Carlson, P.A., and F.C. Berry. 2003. Calibrated Peer Review™ and Assessing
Learning Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference,
ed. D. Budny, 2, F3E1-F3E6, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Digital Library.
Carlson, P.A., and F.C. Berry. 2008. Using Computer-Mediated Peer Review in an Engineering
Design Course. IEEE Transactions of the Professional Communication Society
51, no. 3: 264-279.
Carlson, P.A., A.A. Russell, W.N. Waggenspack, C.G. Wilmot, D.F. Bowles, D.R. Voltmer,
W.T. Monroe, W.N. Hull, and C.D. Raubenheimer. 2012. Improving Engineering Education
with Enhanced Calibrated Peer Review: Assessment of a Collaborative Research Project.
Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering
Clase, K.L., Grundlach, E., and N.J. Pelaez. 2010. Calibrated Peer Review for Computer-Assisted
Learning for Biological Research Competencies. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Education 38, no. 5: 290-295.
Enders, F.B., S. Jenkins, and V. Hoverman. 2010. Calibrated Peer Review for Interpreting
Linear Regression Parameters: Results from a Graduate Course. Journal of Statistics
Education. 18, no. 2: 1-27.
Furman, B., and W. Robinson. 2003. Improving Engineering Report Writing with Calibrated
Peer Review™. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference,
ed. D. Budny, 2, F3E14-16, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Digital Library.
Gerdeman, R.D., A.A. Russell, and K.J. Worden. 2007. Web-Based Student Writing and
Reviewing Performance in a Large Biology Course. Journal of College Science Teaching
Hartberg, Y., A.B. Guernsel, N.J. Simpson, and V. Balaster. 2008. Development of
Student Writing in Biochemistry Using Calibrated Peer Review. Journal for the Scholarship
of Teaching and Learning 8, no. 1: 29-44,
Keeney-Kennicutt, W., A.B. Guernsel, and N. Simpson. 2008. Overcoming Student Resistance
to a Teaching Innovation. Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Likkel, L. 2012. Calibrated Peer Review™ Essays Increase Student Confidence in Assessing
Their Own Writing. Journal of College Science Teaching. 41, no. 3: 42-47.
Londe, S. 2007. CALIBRATED PEER REVIEW™ (CPR) A Powerful Writing Program that
will Save you Time! Focus on Microbiology Education, MicrobeLibrary, American
Society for Microbiology, Spring.
McCarty, T., M.V. Parkes, T.T. Anderson, J. Mines, B.J. Skipper, and J. Grebosky.
2005. Improved Patient Notes from Medical Students during Web-Based Teaching Using
Faculty-Calibrated Peer Review and Self-Assessment. Academic Medicine 80,
no. 10 suppl.: S67-70.
Pelaez, N. 2002. Problem-Based Writing with Peer Review Improves Academic Performance
in Physiology. Advances in Physiology Education 26: 174-184,
Plutsky, S., and B.A. Wilson. 2004. Comparison of Three Methods for Teaching and
Evaluating Writing: A Quasi-experimental Study. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal
Prichard, J.R. 2005. Writing to Learn: An Evaluation of the Calibrated Peer Review™
Program in Two Neuroscience Courses. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education
4, no. 1 (Fall): A34-A39.
Reynolds, J.A., and C. Moskovitz. 2008. Calibrated Peer Review™ assignments
in science courses: Are they designed to promote critical thinking and writing skills?
Journal of College Science Teaching 38, no. 2: 60-66.
Robinson, R. 2001. An Application to Increase Student Reading and Writing Skills.
American Biology Teacher 63: 474-480.
Rudd, J.A., V.Z. Wang, C. Cervato, and R.W. Ridky. 2009. Calibrated Peer Review™
Assignments for the Earth Sciences. Journal of Geoscience Education 57, no.
Russell, A.A. 2004. What Works - A Pedagogy: Calibrated Peer Review. Project Kaleidoscope,
Russell, A.A. 2005. Calibrated Peer Review™ A writing and critical-thinking
instructional tool. In Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Washington DC:
American Association for the Advancement of Science,
Russell, J., and M. Pearson. 2004. Instructional technology jewels. Journal of College
Science Teaching 33, no. 7: 24-28.
Simpson, N., A.A. Russell, A.B. Gunersel, and J. Layne. 2006. Calibrated Peer Review™
in Math and Science: Research and Practice. Proceedings of the National STEM Assessment
Timmerman, B.E., and D. Strickland. 2009. Faculty Should Consider Peer Review as
a Means of Improving Students’ Scientific Reasoning Skill Journal of the South Carolina
Academy of Science 7, no. 1: 1-7.
Walvoord, M.E., M.H. Hoefnagels, D.D. Gaffin, M.M. Chumchal, and D.A. Long. 2008.
An Analysis of Calibrated Peer Review (CPR) in a Science Lecture Classroom. Journal
of College Science Teaching 37: 66-73.
Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. Student peer assessment in higher education:
A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research
Sadler, P., and E. Good. 2006. The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning.
Educational Assessment 11, no. 1: 1-31.
What is Writing in the Disciplines? The WAC Clearinghouse,